logo

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Mark forums read


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Lancer and illegal landing square
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:56 pm 
Death Star Designers
Death Star Designers
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 3886
The answer is rather simple. Counter push cannot move a Strafer into a square that they can't reach the designated landing spot. Just like with Rolling Cleave.

_________________
Bloomilk Ambassador


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Lancer and illegal landing square
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:38 pm 
Major Tierce
Major Tierce

Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 4168
So he could counterpush to do the damage just not move the Lancer (or whatever was strafing him) if it caused it to be unable to reach the landing space?

Thanks Scott.

_________________
When I left you I was but the learner . . . now I am the master.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Lancer and illegal landing square
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:57 pm 
Death Star Designers
Death Star Designers
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 3886
Yes.

_________________
Bloomilk Ambassador


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: -
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 6:51 am 
Unnamed Stormtrooper
Unnamed Stormtrooper

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 pm
Posts: 4
Well Mike , could we take it to the club meeting and vote on it? I think thats how its done.
Send the reps to their meeting and then the other clubs will vote on it?

_________________
go!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: -
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:16 am 
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:53 pm
Posts: 7151
Sispprayera wrote:
Well Mike , could we take it to the club meeting and vote on it? I think thats how its done.
Send the reps to their meeting and then the other clubs will vote on it?

The post you are commenting on is 9 years old. I could be wrong but I'm thinking that ruling has been in effect for nearly a decade.
Nowadays it's more like a handful of players (2-5) in a given area than full-on "clubs".
Mike is no longer the head rules guru . . . that's Swinefeld (Dave) and the Rules Committee's job now.

I don't think I have ever heard of this coming up as an issue. Perhaps most players just ignoring the ruling? I will ask around.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Mark forums read

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Jedi Knights style by Scott Stubblefield