Grand Moff Boris wrote:
Read your cards, young players.
You are right.
It was after 1am, and I was just a little too tired to go drag out my cards and go through them. It's so much more handy to have all the info at your fingertips in Bloomilk. Not to mention when I am not at home and I am posting via my phone or another computer.
I was going to try and remember the question until morning, but I knew I would forget.
swinefeld wrote:
I asked Sithborg about this while I was working on the data for Vengeance/Cantina.
Bloomilk's database is showing the old wording, because I avoided adding 2 additional Rapport abilities for Dr. E and Ponda that read differently, thinking it would be more confusing than the way it is, as they both work the same. The old ones also grant Rapport to the new ones. Anything pre-CotF is assumed to mean "name contains" if it doesn't specify "named" explicitly.
I can add entries with the new wordings with the next v-set update if need be.
And, I need to add my question to Scott's FAQ project list...
So perhaps Bloomilk should be changed so that both versions of each say, "name contains" - so intent is accurate on both. In other words - keep only 1 entry for each, but have the glossary wording say "name contains"