Grand Moff Boris wrote:
LOL, nice. This just reinforces an argument I've supported for a long time. Characters with 0 damage shouldn't be able to attack, ever.
I agree with Dennis 100% here. (Mark the calendar! LOL)
It is silly, luckily it isn't too much of a threat in the meta.
I think it's proof that damage 0 characters were never meant to attack by the fact that the 2 diplomats that were MEANT to attack that WotC made (Imperial Dignitary and Leia Organa, Senator) actually have a base 10 damage. They could have made the Imp Dignitary have 0 base and thn he could get up to 10 damage with the on card opportunist - but no, they gave him 10 base damage. Because he was MEANT to attack.
The 0 damage pieces attacking are just weird rule interactions, and shouldn't be happening. ESPECIALLY silly when they magically gain a blaster, since they don't have "melee" on their card. It wouldn't bother me so bad if they could only attack melee, since really anyone can use their hands and feet (even if ineptly) to fight, but when a commander makes a non-combatant suddenly have a ranged weapon . . . stupid