Lou wrote:
I know it wont change the 3\2 I just want to reward people who win not tie. 1-1-3 1 3pt win 1 loss 3 2pts ties = 9pts, 3-2 3 3pt wins 2 losses = 9 pts
I see. So you think a 5-1 with 12 points deserves to lose to a 4-2 with 12 points.
Well in order to change that we'd have to change the whole system starting at square 1. That would be a major change that I'm not sure I agree with. Daniel would not have even made the finals much less won the whole thig last year.
5-1 is hard enough to do. I don't think anyone should miss the finals going 5-1, unless they couldn't at least finish 2 games, which is how it is now.