NickName wrote:
Lightsaber attacks should count as melee attacks. It's not like the errata would be convoluted, lengthy, or hard to understand for gameplay purposes, so why not?
Gha Natch shouldn't affect Mouse Droids. It's not like the errata would be convoluted, lengthy, or hard to understand for gameplay purposes, so why not?
Jedi should be able to destroy a door with their lightsaber. It's not like the errata would be convoluted, lengthy, or hard to understand for gameplay purposes, so why not?
Ok, the lightsaber youve got me on, and I will concede the point, but I dont feel either of the others are vaild arguements.
Gha doesnt work because you are are talking about altering an existing ability as it applies to one single character. If you wanted to say that Rapport itself cannot lower the cost of any single piece to lower than 3pts, that would be closer, but you are still errating an ability altogether, which isnt what this would be doing. This is effectively the same thing as WOTC forgetting to put the ability on the card.
The jedi blowing upen a door with their sabers is an entirely different can of worms than either of the others, cause you are inventing an entirely new rule with that one, and while I do agree it makes sense, we all know logic holds no water in the world of SWM. Just ask Chewbacca and Tarfful, the giant Ewoks
But yes, I do see your point.
_________________
WotC: 890/890
V-Set: 142/142
Wotc GTL: 52ish
Gamers GTL: 2 (dalsiandon, urbanjedi)
fingersandteeth wrote:
Also t4 for override and a cheeky flame.