SWMGAMERS.com Forums :: View topic - Should Mustafar be banned?

i completely agree Grambo. Wotc map creating staff apparently dont know game mechanics.

After some consideration and discussion with other mods, I have unlocked this thread.

But I think if it becomes a protest for banning certain maps, that is something that should be done on the WotC page for WotC people to see. Venting and protesting about it here won't accomplish anything.

I dont think really changing the game mechanics is ever gonna happen.... I think that Mustafar becomes as issue after the Errata.... It is going to be real hard to keep gambit if you are not playing Rebels

I frankly think Mustafar and Korriban are both equally "bad" now. They are both pure shooter maps, and extremely one-sided. I think Bespin is just as bad because if you roll badly and lose "side choice" and have huges, you are simply dead (they are forced to start in a room they can never get out of).

I really have no trouble with the maps for casual play... but for tournaments, having a map choice decide the game seems absolutely ludicrous to me... and all of those maps effectively do that.

No IMO.
I am not in favor of banning any map same as i am not in favor of banning any mini.
True these maps are not grate, but what if someone did not like a map you all do like should that be banned also. My answer would be know.
These maps you don't like are not that good for both players so you are still on an equal footing. They mite not be good but they are playable.

Author:	kitfisto111493 [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Should Mustafar be banned?
Ok so I have heard my Dad talk about people talking about banning maps. He said that Mustafar might be one of them. I like this map but with the force push should it be banned? I am kind of wondering. So what do you think?

Author:	DarkLordVerjal [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:09 pm ]
Post subject:
with force push here now, uber broken. but im glad, because no boba BH is going have some big problems! finally!so the only map to be banned should be Korriban. period.

Author:	SirStevee [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:
I think mustafar was already a terrible map, but now it is just insane. Push+a small corridor sorrounded by pits= what should be a banned map.

Author:	Sithdragon13 [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:
KMG...Go byebye.

Author:	Grambo [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:50 pm ]
Post subject:
Frankly, I'd throw about half of the WotC maps out, and replace them with JediCartographer's work... his are all balanced, huge friendly, and playable for shooters and melee both. Mustafar... Geonosis... Korriban... Bespin... all should be gone for my money.

SWMGAMERS.com Forums https://www.swmgamers.com/forums/

Should Mustafar be banned? https://www.swmgamers.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1405	Page 1 of 2

Author:	DarkLordVerjal [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:06 pm ]
Post subject:
i completely agree Grambo. Wotc map creating staff apparently dont know game mechanics.

Author:	punxnbutter [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:
DarkLordVerjal wrote: i completely agree Grambo. Wotc map creating staff apparently dont know game mechanics. They were skirmish maps for fun; now we've gone towards competitive play and.....no new maps. (Korriban is the only one that doesn't fit)

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Mustafar, Korriban and the geonosis arena are worthless maps, I say trash them.

Author:	Grand Moff Boris [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:
http://swmgamers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1200

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:
Boris wrote: After some consideration and discussion with other mods, I have unlocked this thread. But I think if it becomes a protest for banning certain maps, that is something that should be done on the WotC page for WotC people to see. Venting and protesting about it here won't accomplish anything. I would start a thread over on WOTC about trying to start a protest, but I lost my password and don't remember the e-mail I used to start my account with when they transfered.

Author:	kitfisto111493 [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:
I started a thread that got Locked!!!! I ROCK!!!!! Gotta go tell my Dad YYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

Author:	SirStevee [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:
I think any map that is wide-open and has unfair starting areas is just unfair.

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:
Another good idea would be each opponent chooses one of their maps, and they connect the selected maps , the middle of the two maps becomes gambit. I remember Fool suggested this a while back.

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:22 pm ]
Post subject:
dnemiller wrote: I dont think really changing the game mechanics is ever gonna happen.... I think that Mustafar becomes as issue after the Errata.... It is going to be real hard to keep gambit if you are not playing Rebels Another alternative is to play a lot of shooters against the rebels, and stay away from the force push/repulse characters and try to shoot them before they can get up to your shooters.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Grambo [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:22 pm ]
Post subject:
I frankly think Mustafar and Korriban are both equally "bad" now. They are both pure shooter maps, and extremely one-sided. I think Bespin is just as bad because if you roll badly and lose "side choice" and have huges, you are simply dead (they are forced to start in a room they can never get out of). I really have no trouble with the maps for casual play... but for tournaments, having a map choice decide the game seems absolutely ludicrous to me... and all of those maps effectively do that.

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:
Grambo wrote: I frankly think Mustafar and Korriban are both equally "bad" now. They are both pure shooter maps, and extremely one-sided. I think Bespin is just as bad because if you roll badly and lose "side choice" and have huges, you are simply dead (they are forced to start in a room they can never get out of). I really have no trouble with the maps for casual play... but for tournaments, having a map choice decide the game seems absolutely ludicrous to me... and all of those maps effectively do that. Its mainly just the rigid huges that can't get out of the room. I don't really think Bespin is that bad but then again I don't really many huges, especially not the rigid ones(except occasionally in 200 games).

Author:	dreadtech [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:
No IMO. I am not in favor of banning any map same as i am not in favor of banning any mini. True these maps are not grate, but what if someone did not like a map you all do like should that be banned also. My answer would be know. These maps you don't like are not that good for both players so you are still on an equal footing. They mite not be good but they are playable.

Author:	Xanthan [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:
dreadtech wrote: No IMO. I am not in favor of banning any map same as i am not in favor of banning any mini. True these maps are not grate, but what if someone did not like a map you all do like should that be banned also. My answer would be know. These maps you don't like are not that good for both players so you are still on an equal footing. They mite not be good but they are playable. Acually mustafar is great for a shooter heavy squad. But horrible for melee heavy squads.