logo

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Mark forums read


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:04 pm 
Unnamed Wookiee
Unnamed Wookiee

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:29 am
Posts: 17
I have been a long time "watcher" of these and WOTC boards. Now I'm starting to wonder if they might ask me to change my name. After reading this and seeing that religous figures shouldn't be used as name, they might get the imipression that I'm some sort of Satan worshipper or something. In alll truth my name comes from my favorite comic book character, a crazy assassin elf named Lusiphur Malache from Poison Elves. I know I don't post over there much, but with a the stuff Bill, and others are going through with what seems to be very technical violations I'm wondering if I might get a warning or something. But it almost makes me think that if I don't, that it might add fuel to this argument. I mean, Che can be interpreted different ways, but unfortunatly most people see mine and think "el Diablo". I've gotten some pretty bad flames from people on other sites, but since the comic and character really have a lot of meaning to me, (even more since the creator Drew Hayes died last year), I don't change it. The point of this long-winded post is that if they were doing modding evenly on everyone, I don't know why I should be able to keep my name. Not that I'm complaining that they don't, guess I'm just making an observation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:28 pm 
Flim
Flim
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Charlotte, MI
NickName wrote:
Tao WAS Che back in 2007 and before becoming a MOD.

After Gleemax killed his brother's account, and since Tao wasn't using the Che account, he gave it to his brother.

Earlier in the thread I posted that I thought Tao was taking it back after the last fiasco and some people (including but not limited to me) confused Che's comments with Tao's since they had been the same person in the past. But Tao confirmed in various posts here that it's still in use by his brother. So that's my mistake, and I apologize for any confusion.

Not positive but reasonably sure enough to post it:

Previously
Tao= Matt
Che= Matt

Now
Tao= Matt
Che= Bobby


Disturbing this information is. Isn't sharing accounts not allowed according to the CoC, and also the reason Tradehouse had to disband.

_________________
--James

"It is the unknown we fear when we look upon death and darkness, nothing more"-- Albus Dumbledore

Proud member of the Triumvirate


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:33 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
jew3 wrote:
NickName wrote:
Tao WAS Che back in 2007 and before becoming a MOD.

After Gleemax killed his brother's account, and since Tao wasn't using the Che account, he gave it to his brother.

Earlier in the thread I posted that I thought Tao was taking it back after the last fiasco and some people (including but not limited to me) confused Che's comments with Tao's since they had been the same person in the past. But Tao confirmed in various posts here that it's still in use by his brother. So that's my mistake, and I apologize for any confusion.

Not positive but reasonably sure enough to post it:

Previously
Tao= Matt
Che= Matt

Now
Tao= Matt
Che= Bobby


Disturbing this information is. Isn't sharing accounts not allowed according to the CoC, and also the reason Tradehouse had to disband.


AAFAIK, it wasn't until D&DI went live,because there was in fact a community poster which was like a wikipedia article, you pm the account asking for the log in info and then you added your normal name to the sig of user's who've already posted with it. It was even asked about that during one of the Q&As in the D&D area.

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:24 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
What the snicker doodle :I've removed content from this thread because Trolling AND Flaming AND Disruption are a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here: http://forums.gleemax.com/community_coc.php

Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in it’s place.

in the GOWK hypothetical thread... O.o and the orc didn't even lock it ROFLOL

EDIT: I just realized that some one went a little nuts....i'm such an idiot when i just glance at stuff

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:49 pm 
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 229
ender_ wrote:
What the snicker doodle :I've removed content from this thread because Trolling AND Flaming AND Disruption are a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here: http://forums.gleemax.com/community_coc.php

Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in it’s place.

in the GOWK hypothetical thread... O.o and the orc didn't even lock it ROFLOL

EDIT: I just realized that some one went a little nuts....i'm such an idiot when i just glance at stuff


Yep, someone is having a little bit of fun over on WotC board... They have hit almost every thread on the front page, and then some...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:52 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
Bantha Rawk wrote:
ender_ wrote:
What the snicker doodle :I've removed content from this thread because Trolling AND Flaming AND Disruption are a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here: http://forums.gleemax.com/community_coc.php

Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in it’s place.

in the GOWK hypothetical thread... O.o and the orc didn't even lock it ROFLOL

EDIT: I just realized that some one went a little nuts....i'm such an idiot when i just glance at stuff


Yep, someone is having a little bit of fun over on WotC board... They have hit almost every thread on the front page, and then some...


i smell a perma ban in the works...

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:57 pm 
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 229
...and they're gone...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:01 am 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
Bantha Rawk wrote:
...and they're gone...


I'm sure it wasn't someone directly involved with the issue,no one from what I can tell is that crazy

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:03 am 
Unnamed Wookiee
Unnamed Wookiee
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 am
Posts: 27
Whoever he was, deserves the Nobel.

ORK_Fudgepacker, you will live forever in my heart.

_________________
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
-Albert Einstein

Reading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.
-John Locke

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
-Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:53 am 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
Well now i fell like everyone else I got the email form CS for replying to a thread that was deleted and it had a pic of a penguin in it and i did a caption for the penguin.....

In our online communities we strive to create a safe and fun environment for all of our members. We have set up a Code of Conduct to be as fair as possible. You can find our Code of Conduct by clicking here .

In participating in our games and services you will encounter thousands of other members who come from different backgrounds and have many different experiences. Certain languages, information and images may not be offensive to you, but may have an effect on someone else.

We found content you posted on the Wizards.com Community Forums that violates section 6, Disruption of the Code of Conduct.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=18586577

We have taken the necessary steps to remove this content. Further violations may result in deactivation or termination of your account. We appreciate your cooperation.

We would appreciate your feedback on the service we are providing you. Please click here to fill out a short questionnaire . To login to your account, or update your question, please click here .

Online Community Conduct
Wizards of the Coast

:roll:

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 6:25 am 
Unnamed Wookiee
Unnamed Wookiee
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 am
Posts: 27
ender_ wrote:
Well now i fell like everyone else I got the email form CS for replying to a thread that was deleted and it had a pic of a penguin in it and i did a caption for the penguin.....

In our online communities we strive to create a safe and fun environment for all of our members. We have set up a Code of Conduct to be as fair as possible. You can find our Code of Conduct by clicking here .

In participating in our games and services you will encounter thousands of other members who come from different backgrounds and have many different experiences. Certain languages, information and images may not be offensive to you, but may have an effect on someone else.

We found content you posted on the Wizards.com Community Forums that violates section 6, Disruption of the Code of Conduct.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=18586577

We have taken the necessary steps to remove this content. Further violations may result in deactivation or termination of your account. We appreciate your cooperation.

We would appreciate your feedback on the service we are providing you. Please click here to fill out a short questionnaire . To login to your account, or update your question, please click here .

Online Community Conduct
Wizards of the Coast

:roll:



Wait.... who are you?

THEY DELETED MY PENGUIN??!?!?!?! IF YOU WERE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS TRANSGRESSION, I'LL HAVE YOUR HEAD.


Oh, and I've heard from reliable sources that ORK_FudgePacker was only banned for 72 hours.

_________________
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
-Albert Einstein

Reading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.
-John Locke

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
-Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:02 am 
Death Star Designers
Death Star Designers
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:06 pm
Posts: 249
NickName wrote:
Tao WAS Che back in 2007 and before becoming a MOD.

After Gleemax killed his brother's account, and since Tao wasn't using the Che account, he gave it to his brother.

Earlier in the thread I posted that I thought Tao was taking it back after the last fiasco and some people (including but not limited to me) confused Che's comments with Tao's since they had been the same person in the past. But Tao confirmed in various posts here that it's still in use by his brother. So that's my mistake, and I apologize for any confusion.

Not positive but reasonably sure enough to post it:

Previously
Tao= Matt
Che= Matt

Now
Tao= Matt
Che= Bobby


Go back and read what Matt said earlier about this subject. Just about everyone on the moderation team knew that Tao/Che = Matt and, up until this event blew up, none of them really knew that now Che = Bobby.

Which might go a long way in explaining why Bobby/Che hardly ever had his posts removed or edited by a mod and, quite possibly, why responses to Bobby/Che were treated with more severity than others. As far as most everyone on the moderation staff was concerned, it was Matt/Tao/Che making those posts. Which is completely unfair and something that I'm sure Bobby/Che abused as much as possible. Matt seems like a pretty nice and reasonable fellow (until you either disagree with him or point out flaws in his logic, then he accuses you of being irrational and stops conversing altogether * ) and it's a shame that his brother has sullied his good name with all of this.

_________________
Image
Check us out if you're in the Atlanta area!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:34 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
Crath Lade wrote:
ender_ wrote:
Well now i fell like everyone else I got the email form CS for replying to a thread that was deleted and it had a pic of a penguin in it and i did a caption for the penguin.....

In our online communities we strive to create a safe and fun environment for all of our members. We have set up a Code of Conduct to be as fair as possible. You can find our Code of Conduct by clicking here .

In participating in our games and services you will encounter thousands of other members who come from different backgrounds and have many different experiences. Certain languages, information and images may not be offensive to you, but may have an effect on someone else.

We found content you posted on the Wizards.com Community Forums that violates section 6, Disruption of the Code of Conduct.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=18586577

We have taken the necessary steps to remove this content. Further violations may result in deactivation or termination of your account. We appreciate your cooperation.

We would appreciate your feedback on the service we are providing you. Please click here to fill out a short questionnaire . To login to your account, or update your question, please click here .

Online Community Conduct
Wizards of the Coast

:roll:



Wait.... who are you?

THEY DELETED MY PENGUIN??!?!?!?! IF YOU WERE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS TRANSGRESSION, I'LL HAVE YOUR HEAD.


Oh, and I've heard from reliable sources that ORK_FudgePacker was only banned for 72 hours.


I liked the penguin.. all i did was put a caption saying "what the penguin is thinking... "I'll get that batman"

and furthermore my asking of whats going on in the moderation thread disappeared too....

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:39 pm 
Name Calling Internet Bully
Name Calling Internet Bully
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:10 pm
Posts: 6172
Location: Gurnee, IL
ender_ wrote:

I liked the penguin.. all i did was put a caption saying "what the penguin is thinking... "I'll get that batman"

and furthermore my asking of whats going on in the moderation thread disappeared too....


Well Trappedslider, now perhaps you understand exactly why the report button, and the way the ORCs respond is problematic to the good of the community.

The lesson to be learned here, is if you don't like your funny jokes to disappear, then you need to be more careful how often you push the report button as well.

_________________
Image

http://www.bloomilk.com/Squads/Search.aspx?UserID=29


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:51 pm 
Really Cool Alien from a Cantina
Really Cool Alien from a Cantina
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:30 pm
Posts: 160
Location: Colorado
LoboStele wrote:
@ S1AL...

Maybe you weren't around much before the Mos Eisley Cantina and Tosche Station sections were set up. There was a few months were ANYTHING remotely off-topic was being deleted or moved over to the generic WOTC off-topic section, which was A) nearly impossible to find, and B) 99% non-SWM people. So when threads got moved over there, they died immediately. A large majority of those threads would've fit into your 2nd and 3rd categories (if categories even exist, as I tend to agree with Boris on that aspect, per the emails we've been seeing from WOTC personnel).


I have to wonder if you're even reading anything I'm writing here. I just said the exact same thing, except that I didn't bother to mention stuff being moved to the general off-topic forum.

Quote:
So yes, threads about GenCon were getting moved to the general Off-Topic section of the boards, where nobody could ever find them again. Threads talking about Star Wars characters, or what other Star Wars books would be good to read, etc. were getting moved over there. So, posts/threads that were 100% Star Wars related, were getting moved to a section of the forums were probably 90% of the regular visitors to that section, didn't give a flip about Star Wars. To many of us at the time, those posts seemed more off-topic in the Off-Topic section, then they had in the SWM General board!


It's impossible to be "off-topic in the off-topic forum," but OK. Again, let me say that I was one of the main people pushing for the off-topic forum.

Quote:
So that's why they eventually started the Tosche Station and MEC. So yes, the post Nickname made about GenCon is OFF-TOPIC for the section of the forum it is in. It should be in either MEC or Tosche Station. As should Moses' OP thread probably, since it's talking about events and such.


Not disagreeing.

Quote:
The whole point is that Wotc_Erik, Tao, ORC_Chaos, the WOTC Customer Service people....they are ALL telling us that people only get warned/banned because they get reported, and that they desire to have consistency on the forums, but it requires the community to be consistent in reporting. Well, that's all Bill and Boris are trying to do. Be consistent. So, for the same things that they got reported/warned/banned for, they are being consistent and reporting those same types of things in other threads.

But lo and behold, when the reports get to the WOTC Mods, they aren't taking any action on them. So, they obviously AREN'T being consistent if Boris gets a 24-Ban for an off-handed comment, and yet posts like mine here (http://forums.gleemax.com/showpost.php? ... tcount=128) go not only un-edited, but I didn't receive a warning, or a ban, or anything. I have a hard time believing that people reported posts in other threads, and yet didn't report mine. And I'm sure that ORC_Chaos was reading the threads. If Boris posted a simple observation of fact, with a single sentence and no malice in it all, then how is my post ANY better at all?? I was personally SHOCKED when I logged in earlier this week and didn't get a notice that I'd been banned. Not that it would have mattered to me much, but that's probably the worst I have EVER blown up on a forum.


Off-topic posts in the middle of off-topic threads have ALWAYS been treated differently than threads that are simply in the wrong location. This is not news to anyone who pays attention at the WotC forums.

And frankly, like NN said, Boris has a history of being excessively critical of the mods. Eventually, it's going to get reported (and in fact, I'm aware of who reported it).

Quote:
I just don't get it. It is NOT consistent. Anyone who thinks there is consistency is either turning a blind eye to it all, or is just plain stupid, IMO.


Guess I'm stupid, then :roll:.

EDIT: As to why your posts didn't get a warning... probably because it was locked very shortly thereafter. Upon seeing that a thread is locked, I really don't bother with anything there at all; the same is probably true of most.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 1:20 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
billiv15 wrote:
ender_ wrote:

I liked the penguin.. all i did was put a caption saying "what the penguin is thinking... "I'll get that batman"

and furthermore my asking of whats going on in the moderation thread disappeared too....


Well Trappedslider, now perhaps you understand exactly why the report button, and the way the ORCs respond is problematic to the good of the community.

The lesson to be learned here, is if you don't like your funny jokes to disappear, then you need to be more careful how often you push the report button as well.


In their defense i can see how the thread was disruptive to the CB forum,but it would have been moved to the station....on the downside this really kicks any future plans for being a VCL ever again out the window,lol

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:34 pm 
Unnamed Wookiee
Unnamed Wookiee

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 24
Nivuahc wrote:
Go back and read what Matt said earlier about this subject. Just about everyone on the moderation team knew that Tao/Che = Matt and, up until this event blew up, none of them really knew that now Che = Bobby.
I'm not sure that I implied that, but I didn't mean to. Because of a high turnover rate, the merging of the WizO and adept teams, and the fact that the Admin and Star Wars teams were pretty separate from the other WizO teams, there aren't many people who know my past work history. In fact, I am the last member of both the Admin and Star Wars WizO teams, so no other ORC currently on the team really knew me prior to the merging of the teams (long after I had abandoned the Che username).

Nivuahc wrote:
Matt seems like a pretty nice and reasonable fellow (until you either disagree with him or point out flaws in his logic, then he accuses you of being irrational and stops conversing altogether * )...
I'm still checking in and answering questions. I've just decided to not attempt to rationalize or excuse things that are outside my ability to rationalize or explain. Doing so is just going to make things more unpleasant for everyone, which is the exact opposite of what I want. There are some things I'm just not going to be able to fix, and I need to be willing to accept that.

I definitely did not mean to imply that anyone was being irrational nor did I mean to make myself unavailable. I just don't want to contribute any further to anything unpleasant.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:09 am 
Unnamed Wookiee
Unnamed Wookiee
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 am
Posts: 27
ender_ wrote:

In their defense i can see how the thread was disruptive to the CB forum,but it would have been moved to the station....on the downside this really kicks any future plans for being a VCL ever again out the window,lol


Not that there.... .y'know..... were

_________________
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
-Albert Einstein

Reading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.
-John Locke

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
-Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:11 pm 
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire
Junk Dealer Extrodinaire

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 265
Crath Lade wrote:
ender_ wrote:

In their defense i can see how the thread was disruptive to the CB forum,but it would have been moved to the station....on the downside this really kicks any future plans for being a VCL ever again out the window,lol


Not that there.... .y'know..... were


actuily i was hoping that when the relaunch d20 modern,that the forum would be on its own and gets a VCL...but since this incident I doubt that i would be picked for it.

_________________
STOP IT! STOP IT! CAN'T YOU SEE THIS CONSTANT FIGHTING IS TEARING US ALL APART?-Carl

Things i've said in the past that got dismissed and now are being talked about:
restricting formats by set
Some chosing not to play the game if and when another company picks it up without the current mechanics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Offline
 Post subject: Re: A letter about WOTC's Moderating Practices
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 6:13 am 
Jedi Knight
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:39 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
right here is another example were they delete a post and yet they do not read the rest of the thread and look I have a quote from the deleted post

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1191562

post# 14

_________________
Image*******Image

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Mark forums read

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Jedi Knights style by Scott Stubblefield